Kim Pearson

© 2003-4. All Rights Reserved

 

Tracy Dalrymple's 12/1 class work

Date: December 1, 2000

To: Jesse Rosenblum

From: Tracy Dalrymple

Re: Nike sponsored children’s golf camp

 

The question of whether to hold a golf camp for Trenton children at the college during the upcoming summer is at our immediate attention. The camp is to be sponsored by Nike, a controversial major US business. Renowned golfer Tiger Woods will make an appearance during the time of the camp. There are many reasons the college should consider the program an asset.

Program: This program will be held on campus for two weeks this summer. Children from Trenton and its surrounding areas will be invited to participate in the program. It will be funded by Nike, with an appearance by Tiger Woods. The children will be housed by the school, and bussed to the local Mountain Range Golf Course where they will be instructed by local golf professionals. This program will link to the school’s College Bound program by allowing children to use the college‘s facilities and help teach them leadership qualities. It may also encourage children to be interested in what a college can offer them in the future.

Mission: While students on campus are requesting a ‘no-sweat’ policy to be sure the school sells items from companies that do not use sweatshop labor. The college’s Mission Statement, Action Statement and Core Beliefs detail its ideas about student leadership, creative expression, and enhanced academics. Only the Core Beliefs state that "the college prepares its students to be successful, ethical and visionary leaders in a multicultural, highly technological, and increasingly globalized world." This would suggest that the school must take into account the ethics involved in sweatshop work and whether or not it applies to this case. The same statement must be considered in deciding whether to sign the ‘no-sweat’ contract. Other colleges, such as the University of Colorado, have denied student protests by signing athletic contracts with Nike this year. The college will not ignore requests of the students by having a one-time relationship with the company.

Nike: Nike is a member of the UN’s Fair Labor Association. While there is still opposition to this organization, it gives proof that Nike is willing to improve working conditions in its factories worldwide. Many businesses, including Nike, have discontinued support of schools that have joined the Worker’s Rights Consortium because the businesses believe it ultimately goes against the workers they are trying to help.

Tiger Woods: Tiger Woods has not made a statement on his position on the issue, however, he has been criticized for abandoning the requests of his mother, of Thai heritage.

Support: Trenton’s mayor, along with the school and golf range are co-sponsors of the event. Outside support for the program will come from the parents of the children involved, the community of Trenton, and many of the college’s large business sponsors and alumni. They will be shown that the college has no intentions of avoiding a working relationship with Trenton and that the school is attempting to relate itself with larger programs to better the status of the school itself.

Opposition: Opposition to this program should be incidental. Student protests and loss of alumni support will be minimal because of the college’s involvement in the community. Whereas the school’s commitment to Nike will be a one-time contract, with no long term relationship with the company, no lasting opposition can occur.

Conclusions: According to this, I feel that the golf camp for Trenton children, sponsored by Nike, should be held by the college. Protests do not outweigh the benefits of the program and will ultimately gain support for the college from businesses, alumni and the local community.